Implementing donor-funded programs in 30+ countries surfaces the same handful of failure modes again and again. The implementers who scale cleanly solve them once, in their global policies, rather than re-solving them country by country.
Multi-currency from day one
Award currency, functional currency, transactional currency, and reporting currency are four different things. Your ERP must record at the transactional currency, revalue monetary balances at period-end, and report results in the donor's award currency without rounding error. Retrofit is painful — design for it.
FX exposure is a real cost, and donors know it
Build an FX policy: how often you draw down, what hedging (if any) is allowed, how realized and unrealized gains/losses are treated, and whether FX losses are charged to the award or absorbed. Most donors permit reasonable FX losses on local operating costs — but only if your policy is written and applied consistently.
Sub-recipient capacity is your capacity
Pre-award assessments, tiered monitoring plans, and capacity-building support are not optional — they are the difference between a clean close-out and a disallowed-cost finding two years after the project ends. Budget for it.
Field-office controls that actually work
- Mobile-money disbursement logs reconciled to provider statements weekly
- Per-diem rates published, signed by recipients, and tied to travel authorizations
- Procurement files digitized in the field and shared with HQ within 48 hours
- Cash-on-hand counts performed by someone other than the cashier, monthly
- Local statutory filings tracked in a global compliance calendar
Close-out starts at award
Inventory disposition, final invoices, unexpended balances, sub-recipient final reports, and the property close-out plan are all easier when the file structure was designed at award. Start with the end in mind.
Standing up a new country office or preparing for close-out? Our international practice has done both at scale.
Contact ECG